The Christchurch District Plan considers the level of risk when managing development, including subdivision, in areas subject to natural hazards:
- The plan’s approach is based on avoiding development in areas where the risks from natural hazards to people, property and infrastructure is assessed as unacceptable. This includes risks from flood events, cliff collapse, rockfall, and mass movement. In these areas, where risks cannot practically be reduced to acceptable levels, the plan discourages new development.
- In areas where the risk from a natural hazard may be able to be managed to acceptable levels, development is allowed where it can be shown that the risk is able to be appropriately mitigated.
- The plan does not manage areas where natural hazard risk is similar to the level of many everyday risks that people face and accept.
High flood hazard management area
The plan states that new development in high flood hazard management areas is to be avoided where it will increase potential risk to people’s safety, well-being and property. This means not increasing density of development and not allowing new development that would place more people and property at risk in the most flood-prone areas.
Most new buildings and subdivision are non-complying activities, meaning that resource consent is likely to be declined. There are some activities that are permitted such as repair of existing buildings, or replacement of buildings where they are a similar size and location as existing buildings.
Residential unit overlay
Within the residential unit overlay new residential buildings or additions require resource consent as a restricted discretionary activity. In certain circumstances new development may be consented where appropriate mitigation can be provided to protect against unacceptable risk.
Some activities are permitted without a resource consent, such as replacement or repair of existing residential units. Subdivision is a non-complying activity and as with subdivision in the High Flood Hazard Management Area, any resource consent will be assessed against a policy direction to avoid where it will increase potential risk to people’s safety, well-being and property.